Online Open Access Journal assure that the peer-review process is completely fair, unbiased & on time. Reviewers are the backbone of our Open Access platform. We are thankful to all our reviewers for their effort, support and time in evaluating the research articles. Comments and evaluations of reviewers plays a vital role in taking a decision on the fate of the manuscripts in consultation with our editors, and calibrating with multiple factors such as scope & relevance and impact of the research. We are in line with COPE guidelines for review process.
Reviewers are suggested to be in contact with the assigning Editors. Major issues like plagiarism, conflicts of interest, data duplication etc. need to mark to the assign editor where as critical evaluations related to content quality of manuscript need to be submitted to both author & editor. The whole review process is confidential as the unpublished content is considered to be classified. Review should be very objective and main focus should be on the quality improvement of the journal.
Personal criticism and comment is strictly prohibited inside the review comments. The review comments should be clear enough with supporting references. Reviewers are advised to include the strength, weakness, relevance and impact of the research work as well as the originality of the research presentation in the manuscript.
The editor need to forward the review comments to the other potential reviewers in addition to the authors. Reviewer should not cite the unpublished manuscript to avoid any cert of clashes.