Welcome to the Online Open Access Journal
+9190780 37929 [email protected]
Welcome to the Online Open Access Journal
+9190780 37929 [email protected]

Editorial Board Member Guidelines

Editorial Board members (EBM) Guidelines: Online Open Access Journal

Online Open Access Editorial Board Member

Source: This is an AI generated image using Gemini

3. Reviewer Workflow and Structured Assessment

When assigned a manuscript for review or adjudication, EBMs must adhere to a structured workflow within the journal’s digital submission system:

Scientific Criterion Key Assessment Questions
Methodological Rigor  Is the study design valid and appropriate for the objectives? Is the statistical analysis robust and correct?
Novelty and Impact  Does the research present novel findings in the related multidisciplinary fields?
Data Validity  Do the Results clearly support the Conclusion? Are Data Availability Statements included and credible?
Ethical Standards Are approvals (IACUC, IRB) clearly stated? For multidisciplinary studies, have human and animal subjects been treated ethically?
SEO and Indexing Are the Title and Abstract concise and accurate? Do the Keywords align with modern research trends (e.g., sustainable, CRISPR-Cas9)?

Roles & Responsibilities of Editorial Board Members

The major role of the editorial board is to advise and support the editor and major decision makers of the fate of the journals. Functions may include:

  • Identifying new topics for commissions, issues, special issues and advising on direction for the journal—giving feedback on past issues and making suggestions for both subject matter and potential authors
  • Provide content by writing occasional editorials and other short articles
  • Approaching potential contributors
  • Help to identify peer reviewers and provide second opinions on papers (i.e. In case there is a conflict between reviewers)
  • Identify appropriate conferences for editors to attend
  • Endorse the journal to authors, readers and subscribers and encourage colleagues to submit their best work.
  • Calling initial articles from editorial board members
  • Solicit a steady stream of articles on a regular basis together with other editorial board members
  • Assigning peer-reviewers to the respective articles and Adding peer-reviewers to the peer-review database
  • Making sure that reviewers respond within the deadline
  • Should ensure the quality of published material through peer-review, own comments, and editing
  • Should ensure the protection of individual data and maintain confidentiality
  • While considering case reports and patient photographs, it is suggested to obtain informed consent in written format
  • An editor must have superior skills to ask for revision without the reviewers’ decision and if needed, should be able to rewrite poorly written manuscripts
  • Suggestions for the development of Online Open Access Publisher journals is highly appreciated.
  • Seeking help in indexing of our Open Access Peer Review Journals

Recruiting Editorial Board Members

  • Editorial board members are the main backbone of our journals and their decisions are final. Hence we choose the best mind to be associated with us. Editorial Board Members decisions are highly regarded within the discipline of the Journals and will be invalid if not under the discipline. Affiliation, Overall research experience, publication number, and academic aptitude are the top deciding factors.
  • Editorial Board members may undergo a gradual changes in every 2 to 3 years with members coming in, stepping down or continue another term. Changes also may happen in the interim, in case some members resigns.

Identification of Potential Candidates:

  • The candidate should be a Ph.D. degree in relevant subject or minimum master degree with 10+ year’s expertise.
  • Candidates must have a good publication record with designated positions in Universities, Research institutes, Hospitals, Corporates and key Organizations.
  • Former guest editors of special issues, Editors of other journals, authors of key reviews, and top reviewers may be suitable.
  • Existing board members can suggest for new members.
  • While recruiting potential board members, they will be provided with a brief description of the roles and responsibilities, with a clear statement that it is a voluntary position with no remuneration related to the post.
  • A healthy, professional good working relationship is needed between the editorial board and the associated editors of the journal. The Editorial board works for the journal and is worthwhile nominating people to the board for a period of time, which is renewable depending upon performance.
  • An up-to-date list of board members, including their areas of expertise will be maintained and, and notes on how useful they have been in the past can be kept.
  • As a publisher, we can highlight and promote our Editorial Members in all the platforms with no objection.
  • The size of editorial board members may vary across journals and disciplines. There is no defined numbers, but what is very important is to globalize our editorial board as much as possible to promote the journal across multiple regions, including developing countries as well.
  • Any Editorial Board members become inactive or will not support actively can be removed from the position with a prior notice among all the members.

Editorial Bord Member's Guidelines: Standards for Academic Leadership

The Online Open Access Journal and the Journal of Agricultural Research and Management (JARM) extend our deepest appreciation to all Editorial Board Members (EBMs) for their essential service in shaping the scientific trajectory of the journal and ensuring scholarly integrity. As recognized leaders in your respective multidisciplinary fields, your role is vital to upholding the rigorous standards of double-blind peer review and fostering innovation within scholarly communication.

1. Core Mandate and Responsibilities

The primary mandate of an EBM is to safeguard the scientific quality and strategic direction of the journal.

  • Strategic Leadership: Define and refine the journal’s scope, identify emerging research trends (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9 in crops, precision agriculture, bio-waste to energy), and suggest special issue topics.

  • Manuscript Evaluation: Actively participate in the peer review process. While editors manage the workflow, EBMs must review a specified number of high-priority manuscripts or provide specialized guidance on complex submissions.

  • Reviewer Advocacy: Assist the Editor-in-Chief in identifying, recruiting, and evaluating the performance of independent peer reviewers, ensuring the board reflects global expertise.

  • Brand Ambassador: Promote the journal at international conferences, within your academic institutions, and through professional networks to attract high-quality submissions.

2. Peer Review and Ethical Standards:

EBMs must embody and enforce the ethical standards established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and ICMJE.

  • Conflict of Interest: Disclose any competitive, collaborative, or financial relationships that could bias your judgment regarding a manuscript. Recuse yourself from handling any submission where a conflict exists.

  • Confidentiality: Treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not discuss their contents or use the data for personal gain before publication.

  • Research Integrity: Be vigilant for signs of academic misconduct, including plagiarism (using tools like iThenticate), data fabrication, falsification, and redundant publication (“salami slicing”).

4. Special Issues and Commissioned Content

EBMs play a proactive role in generating impactful content that drives citation metrics and increases the journal’s h-index.

  • Guest Editing: Propose and manage “Special Issues” on critical, timely topics. As a Guest Editor, you will be responsible for the complete peer-review lifecycle for submissions in that issue.

  • Commissioning Reviews: Identify gaps in current agricultural literature and commission leading experts to write comprehensive Review Articles.

5. Composition, Appointment, and Performance

We strive for an diverse, expert board to reflect the multidisciplinary nature of our scope.

  • Diverse Composition: The board aims for balanced representation across geography, gender, and academic seniority to maintain cultural competency and innovation.

  • Verified Recognition: EBM service is officially certified. We seamlessly integrate with Web of Science (formerly Publons) to allow EBMs to track and claim verified recognition for their editorial and review contributions.

  • Term and Renewal: Appointments are typically for a [e.g., two-year] term, renewable based on mutual interest and active participation in reviewing and strategic planning.

6. Communication and Collaboration

  • Annual Meetings: Participate in virtual or in-person annual board meetings to review performance metrics (e.g., Impact Factor, acceptance rates, time-to-publication) and discuss future strategy.

  • Open Dialogue: Maintain an open line of communication with the Editor-in-Chief regarding journal operations and potential improvements.

We are using cookies to give you the best experience. You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in privacy settings.
AcceptPrivacy Settings

GDPR